Disagreement between investigators will be resolved through discussion, and where required, the thorough re-examining of transcripts. Categories will be represented visually using diagrams to illustrate the conceptual relationship between the emerging categories. See Table 1 for additional qualitative analysis details.
This study seeks to avoid the weakness or intrinsic biases inherent in single method, single observer, and single theory studies by adopting a mixed methods approach [ 20 ]. It will involve a series of steps consistent with rigorous qualitative research [ 20 , 21 ], including: note-taking during clinician interviews; systematic data coding and analysis; detailed documentation of analytic decisions to explicitly demonstrate the means of arriving at the codes, and to avoid overgeneralisation and speculative conclusions; including direct quotations from participants to offer readers some perspective on the evidence from which the study findings and conclusions are based; and reviewing data coding processes, analytic decisions, and resultant themes by the two investigators [ 38 ].
These steps allow for the triangulation of findings by the research team, with high degrees of team involvement required through the stages of data analysis and interpretation [ 28 , 38 ]. This process is designed to increase rigor by decreasing the likelihood that substantial thematic ideas get overlooked, and ensure transparency in both data coordination and interpretation [ 28 ].
Further to the approval for the research from the ethics boards of the hospital and university, the study has also been approved by the Group Executive at the study hospital, including Executive Director of Acute Health and the Chief Medical Officer. Hospitals play an important role in sick care, the provision of rehabilitation services, the promotion of health, and the prevention of disease [ 4 ]. These activities have been core components of hospital work; however, the increasing prevalence of lifestyle-related chronic diseases necessitates a more expanded scope, and standardised provision of initiatives to enable clients to take an active role in preventative health and chronic disease management [ 5 , 7 , 8 ].
This requires the reorientation of health care facilities to integrate health promotion, disease prevention and rehabilitation services in curative care [ 17 ].
Hospitals can have a strong influence on health behaviour, with patients demonstrating more responsiveness to health advice in situations when they are experiencing ill-health [ 39 ]. A fundamental necessity towards integrating health promotion in hospital settings is strong leadership at different levels of hospital governance [ 7 , 8 ]. This leadership is epitomised by hospital surgeons, influential figures within both clinical settings, and by extension, hospital organisational culture and practice [ 16 , 40 ]. Surgeons are seen as the predominant authoritative source of advice and expertise on health issues, having influential roles in both clinical and administrative structure [ 7 , 10 , 39 ].
In spite of this, information regarding the professional practice, and the opinions of these exemplars of clinical practice pertaining to preventative health are absent from the literature. The primary outcomes of this study will be to: 1 identify what health promotion activities surgeons carry out in public hospitals, and 2 explore the attitudes of surgeons towards preventative health practice. The depth of insight gained from the study of these highly professionalised clinical groups will offer a distinctive perspective on current practice, as well as the challenges of implementing effective health promotion into surgical practice.
There are a number of limitations to the proposed study design. A limited number of participants will be recruited for this mixed-methods study. The demographic characteristics of the surgeons who participate in this study will be captured to enable comparison to broader communities of surgeons. Additionally, participants will be recruited from one study site to minimise the range of external influences.
Although this might limit the transferability of the findings to other hospital settings, to our knowledge this will be the first study to capture the opinions of hospital surgeons on this issue. The findings from this research might be used to guide strategy and policy in both clinical and institutional levels around health promotion planning and practice. Gaining the insights from surgeons will be an important step towards the proposed reorientation of hospital practice towards more integrated health promotion settings, culminating in environments that permit patients to take active roles in preventative health and management.
Alwan A. Global status report on noncommunicable diseases Geneva: World Health Organization; World Economic Forum, Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. The epidemiological transition: the current status of infectious diseases in the developed world versus the developing world. Sci Prog. Johnson A, Baum F. Health promoting hospitals: a typology of different organizational approaches to health promotion. Health Promot Int. Health promotion and health systems: some unfinished business. Health promotion--a focus for hospitals.
Aust Health Rev. Health promoting health services: a review of the evidence.
Royal Australian College of Surgeons. Accessed 2 Nov Lipman T. Power and influence in clinical effectiveness and evidence-based medicine. Fam Pract. Ann Behav Med. What advice are oncologists and surgeons in the United Kingdom giving to breast cancer patients about physical activity? Health promotion practices of emergency physicians. Am J Emerg Med. Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.
Gagliardi AR, Alhabib S. Trends in guideline implementation: a scoping systematic review.
Implement Sci. Implementing clinical guidelines: current evidence and future implications. J Contin Educ Heal Prof. Standards for health promotion in hospitals: development and pilot test in nine European countries.
Public Health Research Methods | Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health
Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: from theory to practice. Field Methods. Kaur M. Application of mixed method approach in public Health Research.
Indian J Community Med. Creswell JW, Zhang W. The application of mixed methods designs to trauma research. J Trauma Stress. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research COREQ : a item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. General practice capacity for behavioural risk factor management: a snap-shot of a needs assessment in Australia.
Aust J Prim Health. Rice PL. In quality we trust! The role of qualitative data in health care. Med Princ Pract. Rice PL, Ezzy D. Qualitative research methods: a health focus. South Melbourne: Oxford University Press; Patton MQ. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description?
You are here
Res Nurs Health. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research techniques. Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Richards L, Morse JM. Readme first for a user's guide to qualitative methods: Sage publications; Mosadeghrad AM. Factors influencing healthcare service quality. Int J Health Policy Manag.
www.cantinesanpancrazio.it/components/mihutizu/1205-programma-spia.php Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. Ballinger GA.
- The Spanish Civil War, the Soviet Union, and Communism.
- The First Computers--History and Architectures (History of Computing).
- The contribution of qualitative methods to public health research and policy | Health Knowledge.
- Law and the utopian imagination.
Salazar, and Richard A. Crosby, Ralph J. DiClemente, and Laura F. See All Customer Reviews. Shop Textbooks. Read an excerpt of this book! Add to Wishlist. USD Sign in to Purchase Instantly. Temporarily Out of Stock Online Please check back later for updated availability. Overview The bestselling textbook to understanding health research, updated and expanded Research Methods in Health Promotion provides students and practitioners with essential knowledge and skills regarding the design, implementation, analysis, and interpretation of research in the field of health promotion.
Evaluate the ethics, design, analysis, and interpretation of research Identify and understand the key components of research studies Analyze and interpret the results of experimental and survey research designs Understand the process of publishing a research report and constructing a grant proposal Research Methods in Health Promotion is ideal for both undergrad and graduate methods courses in health promotion and public health.
Thompson and Michelle C. Navigation Introduction to qualitative research Semi-structured, narrative, and in-depth interviewing, focus groups, action research, participant observation The contribution of qualitative methods to public health research and policy Use, analysis and presentation of qualitative data The etthical issues which may arise Common errors and their avoidance Strengths and weaknesses References. Our most popular content Public Health Textbook. Identifying and managing internal and external stakeholder interests. Management models and theories associated with motivation, leadership and change management, and their application to practical situations and problems.
Dietary Reference Values DRVs , current dietary goals, recommendations, guidelines and the evidence for them. Section 1: The theoretical perspectives and methods of enquiry of the sciences concerned with human behaviour. Inequalities in health e. The impact of political, economic, socio-cultural, environmental and other external influences.